(http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/35668-2/rifleman_9622web.jpg)
larger (http://olegvolk.net/gallery/technology/arms/rifleman_9622web.jpg.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=1)
Printable image available on request, too big to attach.
Sweet!
Thanks Oleg!
Hawkhavn
Thanks again for another wonderful job.
That's beautiful O0
Oleg,
That would make a GREAT business card! Appleseed info and personal contact info would be printed on reverse side.
Please PM me!! I have a friend who does cards real cheaply on heavy duty stock and excellent quality.
-fb
Excellent! :~
Thanks! O0
At the risk of getting flamed for saying it, may I suggest more neutral language, e.g., "This rifleman can hit his target at 200 paces." For now, we may want to avoid associating AS with training shooters to engage an "enemy," especially if we are reluctant to identify that enemy, because our detractors will be more than happy to make that association for us but for their benefit.
Oh, I think real thinking folks can figure out what "enemy" one would want to engage at 200 paces. I spent too long learning and training others in all the various ways to strike my country's enemies to think it as less than honorable, something to be hidden under a cloak of TruthSpeak. We do spend time not sugar coating the April 19, 1775 story, I mean Samuel did shoot at the Red coated Regulars about to bayonet him, didn't he?
Strangely enough, BOTH of you guys are right!
In the context of the image above, "enemy" works fine. You can just picture an evil redcoat downrange, getting what he deserves.
On the other hand, Sie is correct: use the word "enemy" in a present-day context, and our enemies (ugh!) will be happy to hit us over the head with it.
Getting involved in some useless scrap over TruthSpeak is guaranteed to take us off-mission - and maybe, even, off-course.
Let's wait until the program is successful before we declare it safe to bring back the First Amendment, along with the others.
Not trying to start something, just hoping to remind all here that we swim in the ocean of 21st-century America, a place where dangerous enemies abound.
Right now, we're not big enough to be worth attacking and eating.
That will come, later, when we get bigger!
And we should be prepared, not to give them any opening, any chink in the armor, any stick with which to beat us.
Printable version (13MB) is at http://olegvolk.net/work/rifleman_9622print.jpg
I can make "target" version if you feel strongly enough about it, but "target" is a generic word while "enemy" provides a size reference.
The greatest enemy to present itself to us right now, is time.\
Edited to add: Thank You Mr. Volk! Your photography is as spectacular as your insight. O0
Why? Are we not making converts faster than they are?
Oleg,
I was amazed to see your name on the forum. I have, and have shared several of your photos of a Jewish family that resonated with me. It is a pleasure to be in your company. I find that although some photos are disturbing, they disturb others enough to think. That's why I love them so much. Thank you for sharing your gift.
Jules
Nice artwork Oleg O0
Quote from: Earl on December 23, 2009, 12:01:19 AM
Oh, I think real thinking folks can figure out what "enemy" one would want to engage at 200 paces. I spent too long learning and training others in all the various ways to strike my country's enemies to think it as less than honorable, something to be hidden under a cloak of TruthSpeak. We do spend time not sugar coating the April 19, 1775 story, I mean Samuel did shoot at the Red coated Regulars about to bayonet him, didn't he?
While you are correct Earl, But "real thinking" people are not nearly as abdundant as we would hope. So we must make our own real thinking people using what we have to work with. Of course you need to attract as many of the almost thinking folks as possible.
Like Fred said, "Let's wait until the program is successful before we declare it safe to bring back the First Amendment, along with the others."
As always... Great work!
Yes, Oleg, in case I forgot - Thank you for your efforts! It's a great image and thought!
:) :) :) :)
In case you're wondering, they call me "Fred the Helpful" around here...
:) :)
OK...So where does that leave us ??? #)
I want to make one of these Poster Board size for Gun Shows.. say 18 X 30 ish
Can it be modified to read ..."can hit his target"...... ? Yeah, yeah I know. But I need to get 'em there first !!
Will it be able to be blown up that big at O. Max and still look good?
Thanks, that is fantastic work. O0
EEL
.
An alternative to "his target" could be "Redcoat."
"This marksman can hit a Redcoat at 200 paces." Every American should be able to make that association. I think "Redcoat" works on many levels.
You are welcome to use them for screen-savers.
Updated versions with new caption:
http://olegvolk.net/work/rifleman_9622v2.pdf - preferred format for printing
http://olegvolk.net/work/rifleman_9622v2.jpg - backup format in case you can't view PDF
Quote from: Fred on December 23, 2009, 12:31:11 AM
Strangely enough, BOTH of you guys are right!
In the context of the image above, "enemy" works fine. You can just picture an evil redcoat downrange, getting what he deserves.
On the other hand, Sie is correct: use the word "enemy" in a present-day context, and our enemies (ugh!) will be happy to hit us over the head with it.
Getting involved in some useless scrap over TruthSpeak is guaranteed to take us off-mission - and maybe, even, off-course.
Let's wait until the program is successful before we declare it safe to bring back the First Amendment, along with the others.
Not trying to start something, just hoping to remind all here that we swim in the ocean of 21st-century America, a place where dangerous enemies abound.
Right now, we're not big enough to be worth attacking and eating.
That will come, later, when we get bigger!
And we should be prepared, not to give them any opening, any chink in the armor, any stick with which to beat us.
My 2 cents,
I agree with Fred's assessment.
For some reason, grumpy old guys' wisdom seems to always be correct, despite my middle aged vigor for truth and want to be right.
We cannot give "them" any chink the the armor to focus on, PERIOD. (I really liked that analogy, Fred....old guys and wisdom).
In addition, these two replies are a good alternative to the original text in the very outstanding photo.
Quote from: asminuteman on December 23, 2009, 08:39:42 PM
I'm with EEL on this,
1 small change to "Target" and can it be blown up large and retain image quality? (18x 30 / 24x36)
also...*personnal* can I use as a screen saver?...your artwork and all
to bad it wasn't a "small" or short movie
Quote from: Sie on December 23, 2009, 09:41:30 PM
An alternative to "his target" could be "Redcoat."
"This marksman can hit a Redcoat at 200 paces." Every American should be able to make that association. I think "Redcoat" works on many levels.
Brett
Resolution is plenty for even the biggest prints.
This is fantastic work Oleg - Thank You!
Oleg:
I would like to reiterate what my wife, Jules, said - I'm a huge fan of your work! I have been sharing your photos and watching your skills improve over the years. You are a THE master at catching the positive side of the armed citizen, the real and actual people, on film.
Your messages are spot on when viewed from the perspective of our own personal opinions, we each have a right to those opinions and, on our own time, should take every opportunity to share those opinions.
When it comes to Appleseed though, sadly the rules must change.
Appleseed must not give the anti-gun groups ANYTHING to be used against us. Anything that gives the least hint of aggression being connected to Appleseed should be avoided or Appleseed will set itself up as the lightning rod for the misguided, Brady loving, short sighted, few that would rather trade "Liberty for Safety". They will create enough falsehoods about us on their own as we grow into the largest Pro-Liberty group in the nation, we do not need to hand them the ammunition to twist and throw back at us, and I promice you they will make every effort to do just that.
Keep in mind that Appleseed's strength is in exponential growth, that is our "Big Stick" (actually it's huge, gigantic even!). Having that Big Stick allows us DEMANDS FROM US, that we speak softly!
Your contributions are priceless! Very few individuals in this country (in fact NONE that I know of anywhere) have the talent to portray the truth of the Second Amendment in such striking and beautiful ways. I look forward to every new photo and poster you craft.
Rod Jackson
I have the download screen saver, and I like it with redcoat, thanks Oleg - you do great work and I don't know why I never thought to see if you were on the forum or knew about Appleseed.
QuoteResolution is plenty for even the biggest prints.
No kidding! He's brave to do that without goggles.
BD is right. We're selling the American Heritage of personal, invested involvement, best demonstrated by the actions of the Minutemen at the North Bridge on April 19th, 1775. I suppose we could discuss the writings of Paine, Franklin, and Jefferson, but I don't think talking about essays will have quite the draw of shooting guns. ^-^ It's part of the reason we can honestly say that "We are not a Second Amendment organization"; the marksmanship is secondary to the goal of active citizenry. By mastering the Six Steps to Taking a Shot, we hope that those men and women will take the Seventh Step.